Emma Wilson vs Savine Erler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 11:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Wilson vs S. Erler

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wilson 1 - 0 Erler
They have played 3 sets in total, with Emma Wilson winning 2 and Savine Erler winning 1. The last match between Emma Wilson and Savine Erler was at the W35 Birmingham, 13-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Emma Wilson getting the victory 6-4 4-6 12-10.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wilson | 1 |
| Erler | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Birmingham(10-13-25)
E. Wilson vs S. Erler H2H Profile
E. Wilson vs S. Erler Match Preview:
- Emma Wilson's recent second serve performance is stronger, winning 43.10% of points compared to Savine Erler's 37.18%. Could this give Emma an advantage? It seems likely.
- When it comes to returning serves, Savine Erler excels, capturing 51.82% of her opponent’s second serve points, compared to Emma's 38.36%.
- Savine also outperforms in returning first serves, with a 38.22% success rate, while Emma manages 26.37%.
- Under pressure, Erler has a higher breakpoint save percentage at 49.39%, whereas Wilson stands at 35.90%.
- In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Savine has a stronger win rate at 73.33% against Emma’s 54.55%.
- Both players have their highest career win percentages on Hard courts at 58%.
- Emma has mostly played at the Challengers/ITF level, winning 55.56%, while Savine has competed at Futures/Satellites/ITF, with a 75.00% success rate.
- Looking at opponent quality, Savine has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 306.93 versus Emma's 340.64.
- If a match goes to a deciding set, Savine has a slight edge with a 50% win rate, compared to Emma's 44%.
- Current event statistics can also influence match predictions, so reviewing recent performances in the event may sway the outcome.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
Emma Wilson enters this match with a solid second serve, which may provide an edge in service games. However, Savine Erler's ability to return both first and second serves effectively could pose a significant challenge to Wilson's serve-focused strategy.
Erler's higher breakpoint save percentage suggests she can handle pressure situations well, a critical factor in close matches. Additionally, her superior win rate over the past year, despite competing at a lower event level, indicates consistency and competitiveness.
With both players having their best performances on Hard courts, the surface won’t particularly favor either athlete. However, Erler's record against stronger opponents and her slight advantage in deciding sets give her an edge.
Considering all factors, Savine Erler is most likely to clinch victory in this upcoming match against Emma Wilson.
Emma Wilson vs Savine Erler Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Wilson vs S. Erler H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 22 | Games Won | 20 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:51:55 | Average Match Time | 1:51:55 |
| 75% (60/80) | 1st Serve % | 82% (60/73) |
| 67% (40/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (34/60) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (8/13) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (3/15) |
| 42% (31/73) | Return Points Win % | 40% (32/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Wilson Recent Matches Played
S. Erler Recent Matches Played

E. Wilson vs S. Erler Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.03% (70/62) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.83% (28/25) |
| 51.95% (160/148) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.50% (63/57) |
| 50.98% (1527/1468) | Games Win/Loss | 51.46% (582/549) |
| 57.53% (42/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.88% (19/15) |
| 49.12% (28/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 297 | Aces Total | 29 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 397 | Total Double Faults | 85 |
| 1:22:41 | Average Match Time | 1:38:5 |
| 377.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 297.32 |
| 65% (5114/7879) | 1st Serve % | 71% (2349/3297) |
| 64% (3295/5114) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (1322/2349) |
| 45% (1246/2765) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (433/949) |
| 47% (378/800) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (210/424) |
| 42% (3305/7837) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1481/3128) |
| 53.57% (60/52) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Futures W/L | 56.82% (25/19) |
| 53% (69/131) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (27/52) |
| 52% (14/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 53% (24/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 86% (70/60) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (28/22) |
| 14% (70/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (28/6) |
| 16% (62/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (25/5) |